This convention is known by several names because Mike Cappelletti Sr., Fred Hamilton, and Julian Pottage (in the UK) are all credited for it. For simplicity I am just going to refer to it as Cappelletti.
Cappelletti is a defensive bidding convention after an opponent has opened 1NT. Overcaller's available conventional calls are as follows.
Overcall | Meaning |
---|---|
Double | Penalty with roughly 15+ points. (See also: Gates Double) |
2![]() | A one-suited hand (any suit, normally 6+ cards) with roughly 11-14 points. |
2![]() | At least 5-4 or 4-5 in hearts and spades, asks partner to correct to either major. |
2![]() | At least 5-5 in hearts and a minor. |
2![]() | At least 5-5 in spades and a minor. |
2NT | At least 5-5 in clubs and diamonds. |
Cappelletti is a popular convention against the weak 1NT, because it retains a natural double while still offering a way to compete with a variety of major-suited hands.
Responses to the Double
Advancer (overcaller's partner) is typically expected to pass. However, she may run with a 5+ card suit and a very weak hand.
Responses to the 2
Overcall
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
Pass | 6+ clubs. |
2![]() | Artificial relay, asking partner to pass with diamonds or to bid 2![]() ![]() ![]() |
2![]() | 6+ hearts, nonforcing. |
2![]() | 6+ spades, nonforcing. |
2NT | 10+ points, balanced and forcing for one round. Partner can raise to 3NT, or run to his suit at the 3-level. |
Responses to the 2
Overcall
Advancer normally signs off in .
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
Pass | 6+ diamonds. |
2![]() | Natural preference, nonforcing. |
2![]() | Natural preference, nonforcing. |
2NT | Artificial and forcing, roughly 10+ points. Overcaller's rebids are natural. |
Responses to the 2
Overcall
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
Pass | A weak hand with tolerance for hearts. |
2![]() | Promises 6+ spades, no heart support, nonforcing. |
2NT | Artificial, no heart support, asking for partner to bid his minor suit at the three level. |
3![]() | Promises 6+ good clubs, no heart support, nonforcing. |
3![]() | Promises 6+ good diamonds, no heart support, nonforcing. |
3![]() | Promises 3+ hearts, nonforcing. |
Responses to the 2
Overcall
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
Pass | A weak hand with tolerance for spades. |
2NT | Artificial, no spade support, asking for partner to bid his minor suit at the three level. |
3![]() | 6+ good clubs, no spade support, nonforcing. |
3![]() | 6+ good diamonds, no spade support, nonforcing. |
3![]() | 6+ good hearts, no spade support, nonforcing. |
3![]() | 3+ spades, nonforcing. |
Responses to the 2NT Overcall
Response | Meaning |
---|---|
3![]() | A weak hand with tolerance for clubs. |
3![]() | A weak hand with tolerance for diamonds. Tends to deny club support. |
3![]() | 6+ good hearts, no support for either minor, nonforcing. |
3![]() | 6+ good spades, no support for either minor, nonforcing. |
3NT | To play. |
4![]() | 3+ clubs, nonforcing. |
4![]() | 3+ diamonds, nonforcing. |
In Competition
In "25 More Bridge Conventions You Should Know", authors Barbara Seagram and David Bird suggest the following calls by advancer.1
- When 2
is doubled, then redouble is SOS.
- When 2
is overcalled, then double is for takeout. This promises some values since advancer could simply pass instead.
- When 2
is doubled, then redouble is SOS, asking overcaller to bid his better major.
- When 2
is overcalled, then double is for penalties.
- When 2
or 2
is doubled, then redouble is SOS, asking for partner's minor.
- When 2
or 2
is overcalled, then double is for penalties.
Modified Cappelletti
This variation of the Cappelletti convention uses
However, it should be noted that Mike Cappelletti himself has been quoted as saying, "I can't stand it. Using .
,
At any rate, the structure is as follows.
Overcall | Meaning |
---|---|
Double | Still penalty. |
2![]() | A minor one-suiter, or at least 5-4 or 4-5 in a major and a minor. Relay to ![]()
|
2![]() | Still a major two-suiter. |
2![]() | 6+ hearts. |
2![]() | 6+ spades. |
2NT | Still a minor two-suiter. |
Origins
Mike Cappelletti Sr. and Fred Hamilton (both American experts) and Julian Pottage in the UK are credited for this convention.